<body leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0"><iframe src="http://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID=10424169&amp;blogName=MISRC+News&amp;publishMode=PUBLISH_MODE_FTP&amp;navbarType=BLUE&amp;layoutType=CLASSIC&amp;homepageUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.misrc.umn.edu%2Fnews%2Fdefault.aspx&amp;searchRoot=http%3A%2F%2Fblogsearch.google.com%2F" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" height="30px" width="100%" id="navbar-iframe" title="Blogger Navigation and Search"></iframe> <div id="space-for-ie"></div>
MISRC Logo

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

MISRC Research Announcements

The MISRC is announcing the following three research papers:

Optimal Timing for Software Functionality Additions by Internet Portals

Towards a Theory of Value Latency for IT Investments

New Buyers' Arrival under Dynamic Pricing Market Microstructure: The Case of Group-Buying Discounts on the Internet

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

MISRC Research Announcements

The MISRC is announcing three research papers:

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Research Announcement

We are now announcing three new research papers:

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Research Announcement: Information and Decision Sciences Department

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Research Announcement: Information and Decision Sciences Department

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Senior Assistant Professor position in Information and Decision Sciences at the Carlson School of Management

The University of Minnesota is well known as one of the founding schools for the MIS discipline and is home to the Management Information Systems Research Center and the MIS Quarterly. The Department has 10 tenured/tenure track faculty. The Department teaches courses and performs research in all areas of the information systems discipline including IT/IS in organizations, Economics of IS, Design and Management of Systems, Individual and Organizational Decision Support and Knowledge Management. There is an active doctoral program in information systems with 12 students in residence. Carlson School faculty are among the world’s most prolific, ranking first in total number of scholarly articles published in top MIS journals according to a study published in the October 2006 issue of Communications of the Association for Information Systems, and 7th for research productivity by the Academy of Management Journal. The IS MBA program is ranked 5th by U.S. News and World Report. For more information on the department visit our web pages at http://www.csom.umn.edu/ and http://www.misrc.umn.edu/

For more information on the position, see URL below

http://www.carlsonschool.umn.edu/Page6927.aspx

Friday, April 14, 2006

Gediminas Adomavicius receives $450,000 Career Award

Carlson School Information Systems professor receives $450,000 Career Award
What: Carlson School of Management professor receives $450,000 Career Award from the National Science Foundation
Who: Gediminas Adomavicius, assistant professor of information and decision sciences at the Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota
Contact: Dawn Skelly, Carlson School of Management, 612-624-8770, dskelly@csom.umn.edu

Carlson School of Management Information Systems professor receives $450,000 Career Award from the National Science Foundation

MINNEAPOLIS (Feb. 21, 2006)- Gediminas Adomavicius, assistant professor of information and decision sciences at the Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, has received a $450,000 Career Award from the National Science Foundation (NSF) to research personalization technologies that can recommend content, services, and products to individual consumers based on their personal preferences and buying habits.

Adomavicius' $450,000 grant will begin this summer and will be funded at $90,000 per year for five years. Adomavicius was recognized as one of just a handful of award recipients at leading schools of business, information technology and computer science throughout the country. Adomavicius' research will contribute to both theory and practice by developing new frameworks, models, algorithms, and implementations that provide effective ways to deal with information overload and promote access to relevant information.

"This award is a great honor for me and for our University," said Adomavicius. "Many businesses are engaged in providing personalized content, such as news feeds, or recommending products based on previous purchases, but don't take into account the context in which they are making recommendations. Take online booksellers, for example. You may have bought a textbook for a certain class, and then every time you visit the site, they recommend similar textbooks, not knowing that you may never need another book like that again. My research will help businesses better understand their customers and help individuals deal with the vast amounts of data they encounter when making decisions."

Rob Kauffman, chair of the Carlson School's Department of Information and Decision Sciences, said personalization technologies are increasingly important in our knowledge-intensive world, where new information is created at breakneck speed. "We need these technologies to help companies navigate huge amounts of data that exist in customer relationship management systems," Kauffman said. "We are proud that the NSF has chosen to recognize Gediminas with its prestigious Career Award for junior faculty researchers. He’s at the leading edge of university efforts about how organizations can turn business intelligence into business profits."

John Fossum, acting associate dean for faculty and research at the Carlson School of Management, said the grant will help bridge the gap between these sophisticated technologies and our understanding of human behavior. "The business world is always looking to learn more about its customers, their profiles and their buying habits," Fossum said. "And consumers need help making choices. They can search the Web when they know exactly what they are looking for, but when they want recommendations that relate to certain tastes and preferences, personalization technologies are going to help them."

About the Carlson School of Management
The Carlson School of Management at the University of Minnesota is an AACSB (Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business) accredited business school with more than 4,400 students (1,700 undergraduates, 2,600 graduate students, 110 doctoral students), nine degree programs, 130 faculty, 300 staff and 46,000 alumni around the world.

The Carlson School is internationally ranked. In the April 2005 U.S. News & World Report graduate business school ranking, the Carlson School Full-Time MBA program ranked 23rd and the Carlson Executive MBA program ranked 20th. The Carlson Part-Time MBA program is ranked sixth by Forbes and the Undergraduate program ranked 12th by U.S. News & World Report. The Carlson School's Department of Information and Decision Sciences ranks seventh in the 2006 U.S. News & World Report MBA Academic Disciplines ranking and fifth in the U.S. News & World Report 2006 Undergraduate Academic Disciplines ranking.

For more information, visit carlsonschool.umn.edu.

About the National Science Foundation
The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent federal agency that supports fundamental research and education across all fields of science and engineering, with an annual budget of nearly $5.47 billion. NSF funds reach all 50 states through grants to nearly 2,000 universities and institutions. Each year, NSF receives about 40,000 competitive requests for funding, and makes about 11,000 new funding awards. The NSF also awards over $200 million in professional and service contracts yearly.

Getting the Price Right Online: Rob Kauffman studies pricing strategies


Rob Kauffman studies pricing strategies of Internet retailers and the expectation that the best prices are found online.

When the Internet first arrived, knowledgeable observers thought it would change the way companies compete and make profits, and that consumers would turn to the Internet to get the lowest prices. However, outside of shopping for airline and hotel tickets and rental cars, this is not what marketing and information systems researchers have been seeing.

"The promise of the Internet was that online retailers would be able to change prices at a moment's notice to remain competitive, and consumers could compare prices to get the lowest price," said Rob Kauffman, professor of information and decision sciences at the Carlson School of Management. He is studying how often prices change on the Internet.

"Most business people expected prices on the Internet to be much more flexible, without the physical costs that a store must endure to change price tags and update print media advertisements," said Kauffman. "The Internet was supposed to become a 'frictionless' environment for prices. Internet-based sellers would use technology to track their competitors' prices and products, shoppers would consult 'shopbot' comparison tools, and the market would reach an epic level of efficiency-like a financial market that trades stocks and other financial instruments."

Kauffman said that many strategic pricing experts believed that customers would be able to find better deals online for products sold at stores like Target or Best Buy. This is because vendors would have access to shopping data in real-time and be able to make quick price adjustments.

However, the failure of early dot-com retail sites proved that the actual costs of changing prices may be higher than just the physical costs. Professor Kauffman, marketing professor and pricing expert Mark Bergen, and information systems doctoral candidate Dongwon Lee join other business school researchers now looking at online pricing models for a variety of products, including automobiles, books, computers, electronics, and insurance products. They study price rigidity-how often prices change on the Internet-because markets may behave differently based on the frequency of price changes, Kauffman said.

Less frequent price changes may be used by sellers to signal higher quality and avoid the impression in the marketplace that the company is interested in serving consumers who are only "chasing prices," Kauffman said. Frequent price changes may confuse consumers, who are searching for appropriate prices, not necessarily the lowest ones. Frequent price changes can even make a retailer appear dishonest, as customers try to interpret the firm's motives behind a price change. So consistency of a seller's prices over time-even in the presence of shopbots-may be desirable from a consumer's standpoint.

According to Bergen, who studies pricing and branding, frequent price changes don't necessarily work when a company is selling a brand as much as a product. "Companies are increasingly savvy about making sure Web surfers choose their products over the competition," Bergen said. "They know, in many cases, that price is not the defining factor. Some people want to know they are buying high-quality products so they seek information about the features, benefits, and services being offered. Others want to know they will get their products shipped on time or that the company will stand behind its products if there is a problem. These factors lie at the heart of a company's brand and image and are often more important than getting the lowest price."

Bergen, Kauffman, and Lee researched the daily Internet pricing patterns for Amazon.com and Barnes&Noble.com and found that these retailers use several pricing strategies and theories. By tracking the prices of 330+ books over 450 days in 2003 and 2004, the research team uncovered a number of ways that Internet retailers appear to be using to lure and retain their online customers, keep ahead of the competition, and make a profit.

Their research, "Beyond the Hype of Frictionless Markets: Evidence of Heterogeneity in Price Rigidity on the Internet," was published in the October 2005 issue of the Journal of Management Information Systems. "Prices on the Internet appear to be more rigid than we ever might have guessed," said Kauffman. "Our results should break the hype that surrounds expectations of 'frictionless markets' and the idea that Internet technology somehow has fundamentally changed strategic pricing. It probably hasn't."

Their findings come at a time when consumers are turning to the Internet in increasing numbers to make their purchases. According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, Internet sales rose nearly 25 percent over last year's sales, during the first quarter of 2005. At the same time, brick-and-click retailers like Best Buy, Target, and Barnes & Noble have been placing more emphasis on their Internet customers and doing their best to figure out how to price and market their products online.

To study the online book retail market, Lee, an expert in computer-based analytics for e-commerce, developed a software program to cull data from the two retail sites on the Internet, as well as BestWebBuy.com, a price comparison site. After crunching the data, six findings emerged:

1) Internet retailers appear to change prices on any day of the week. This is in contrast to grocery stores and retailers, who adjust prices with sale fliers and print and radio advertisements to take advantage of greater demand that occurs around the weekend. Internet retailers-perhaps due to their high technology prowess-are capable of being more flexible than traditional bricks and mortar retailers. Yet they don't take advantage of this new capability, choosing instead to change prices very infrequently-on average every 222 days for Amazon.com and every 56 days for Barnes & Noble.com.

2) Price adjustments for books occur less frequently than every day-every 90 days on average for the companies they studied. One possible explanation, according to Lee, is that demand for books is fairly constant over time and books are non-perishable, unlike airline or hotel tickets, so prices don't need to change as much.

3) On some days of the year, price change activity is great. According to the data, prices changed most frequently on tax day, April 15 (when many consumers are focused on paying their taxes); followed by June 2, which is around the time that the summer reading season begins and school lets out. Other price change days included the first days of January, February, June, and September.

4) Surprisingly, none of the top 10 price change days occurred in the Christmas holiday shopping season or around other holidays. The exception is the New Year's holiday period of January 1 and 2, 2004, which ranked seventh and ninth in their price change data. "Physical stores have to increase their staffing levels around the end-of-the-year holidays or encourage their customers to wait for the week's bargains to be found in the newspaper ads," said Lee. "Internet book sales are probably inelastic around the holiday season. People buy books as gifts, and so the retailers' keep their prices high, reflecting this inelastic demand, even though they may advertise more aggressively during this period. In addition, Internet booksellers probably also have smoother sales levels across the entire year, unlike traditional retailers who generate larger portions of their revenues between Thanksgiving and New Year's Day. If these retailers don't reduce prices in the face of very high demand, they risk missing the market at a crucial time."

5) Price change activity varies by book category. Their data show a high of one change on average every 61 days for bestsellers to a low of one change every 184 days on average for steadysellers, classic books by authors such as Hemingway or Faulkner. "This seems to be based purely on supply and demand," Lee said. "Steadysellers seem likely to have more stable and better understood demand structures than either new books or bestsellers." In addition, media hype surrounding bestsellers may change demand and also affect prices.

6) Amazon.com changed its book prices every 222 days, while Barnes&Noble.com changed its book prices every 56 days on average. There could be a number of reasons for this, including the fact that Barnes & Noble entered the online market later than Amazon.com and may be relying on pricing expertise from its traditional store operations, said Lee. Barnes & Noble also offers a fee-based service called "Reader's Advantage," which entitles the buyer to 10 percent discounts on all in-store and Internet-based purchases, and builds a basis for affinity purchasing-though they may not have lower prices than Amazon.com. Another interpretation of Amazon.com's relatively stable online pricing may lie in the negative media reports that resulted from Amazon.com's brief (and unsuccessful) foray into computer-based price discrimination for its existing customers. In this case, Amazon.com briefly charged different segments of its customers higher or lower prices, before its customers rebelled. Yet another theory is that people think a store is of higher quality if its prices are higher, so prices are less flexible for higher-priced, higher-quality stores, Lee said. In addition, these stores typically offer more customer service and more product choices, so they may face higher costs and seek higher margins and keep their prices higher for longer periods of time.

The bottom line is that new capabilities that Internet technology offers do not seem to impact other factors central to making pricing decisions-like a company's quality and service profile in the marketplace, its own understanding of pricing strategies relative to its brick operations, the sophistication of its competition, consumer impressions of reasonable pricing, and overall demand. Still, online retailers must make sure they are taking advantage of current technologies, since their capabilities are increasingly at the heart of a modern firm's abilities to effectively set prices.

"To be successful in the online marketplace, today's retailers must align their pricing strategies with their brands and ensure that their operations are in line with the current capabilities that information technology offers for competitive advantage," Kauffman said. "Our next step will be to compare these price change findings with other product categories and industries, in order to build the basis for a more complete understanding of the most advantageous pricing strategies of Internet retailers."